Are we in or out? EDITORIAL GLASS CANADA October 2021 Volume 33 • Number 5 Annex Business Media P.O. Box 530, Simcoe, Ontario N3Y 4N5 READER SERVICE Print and digital subscription inquiries or changes, please contact Shawn Arul, Audience Development Manager Tel: 416.510.5181 Fax: 416.510.6875 Email: sarul@annexbusinessmedia.com Mail: 111 Gordon Baker Rd., Suite 400, Toronto, ON M2H 3R1 EDITOR | Patrick FLANNERY pflannery@annexbusinessmedia.com 226.931.0545 ASSOCIATE EDITOR | Alex MACKENZIE amackenzie@annexbusinessmedia.com 416.510.6809 PUBLISHER | Danielle LABRIE dlabrie@annexbusinessmedia.com 519.429.5187 BRAND SALES MANAGER | Nav MATHARU nmatharu@annexbusinessmedia.com 226.931.5095 ACCOUNT COORDINATOR | Barb COMER bcomer@annexbusinessmedia.com 519.429.5171 MEDIA DESIGNER | Curtis MARTIN VP SALES/GROUP PUBLISHER | Martin McANULTY mmcanulty@annexbusinessmedia.com COO | Scott JAMIESON sjamieson@annexbusinessmedia.com SUBSCRIPTION RATES Canada -1 Year $37.00 (plus tax) U.S.A. -1 Year $85.00 (in CDN dollars) Publication Mail Agreement #40065710 Printed in Canada ISSN 0843-7041 Occasionally, Glass Canada will mail information on behalf of industry-related groups whose products and services we believe may be of interest to you. If you prefer not to receive this information, please contact our circulation department in any of the four ways listed above. Annex Privacy Officer privacy@annexbusinessmedia.com Tel: 800-668-2374 No part of the editorial content of this publication may be reprinted without the publisher’s written permis-sion. ©2021 Annex Business Media. All rights reserved. Opinions expressed in this magazine are not necessarily those of the editor or the publisher. No liability is assumed for errors or omissions. All advertising is subject to the publisher’s approval. Such approval does not imply any en-dorsement of the products or services advertised. Publisher reserves the right to refuse advertising that does not meet the standards of the publication. We need to decide if this industry thing really works for us. Readers of this magazine will remember the Xinyi debacle, chronicled by Frank Fulton, in which a proposal to build a float glass plant near Guelph, Ont., was torpedoed by a vocal group of environmental activists advancing evidence-free concerns about groundwater use, among other objections. Now, the good folk of Guelph have risen up again in opposition to another industrial development pro-posal, this time for a plant to manufacture refrigerators and freezers. A process, by the way, that is already taking place in nearby Georgetown. The complaints seem familiar, even though the industry and process are completely different. Groundwater is being brought up again, even though the new plant doesn’t draw any for its production process. The opposition groups are raising the spectre of fuel spills from trucks and foam from firefighting efforts in the event the plant has a fire. Given this concern, it’s hard to see what development could possibly meet their approval. Well, actually there is one. Some of the objectors mentioned the need to pre-serve farmland. Funny, I thought fires and spills happened on farms, too. Not to mention the introduction of tanks full of pesticides and fertilizer. But let’s leave that aside to address the ques-NEXT ISSUE tion of why apparently any industrial development can • Facade no longer go forward in Ontario. There have always been people who don’t like integration factories and cities. They place great emphasis on their • Material concerns for the health, social and economic conse-handling quences of damaging the environment, and also raise moral questions about destroying ecosystems and po-tentially entire species. I’m not here to litigate the environmental debate; suffice to say I’m sympathetic to each side on certain points. But it seems indisputable that, for better or worse, modern society depends on some level of industrial activity in order to function. These proposals for development keep coming before city coun-cils and they are backed by large companies and financial institutions comprising thousands of people. I don’t know what the polling numbers show in Guelph, but I bet there is at least some support for a new plant with all the investment and jobs it would bring. Obviously, Guelph councillors have to follow the mandate of their constituents. But is that mandate really reflected in the loud groups who appear at these planning meetings? Making decisions can be scary, but I think Guelph councillors and their fel-lows across the province and the country need to make one on this larger issue. If proposals come before them that meet all the regulatory burdens (of which there are many), yet can still be killed simply through the vocal opposition of a pos-sibly non-representative group, then government simply loses the ability to do anything, for good or ill. There will always be opposition to anything from some quarter. Municipal governments should take a clear position on whether they sup-port industrial development in their precincts or not, and communicate it openly. If they do, they should face down opposition when proposals meet the standards set out for them. If they don’t, they should say so, and companies can stop wasting their time. • @GlassCanadaMag www.glasscanadamag.com 4 October 2021 | GLASS CANADA
Glass Canada October 2021: Page 4
