Glass Canada - February 2017

Schools With A View

Jeff Razwick 2017-02-02 02:35:30

Modern fire-rated glazing makes the grade in schools.

If you walk through the recently opened Brooklin high school in Whitby, Ont., one of the first things you may notice is its open and light-filled interior. The 173,200-square foot facility includes extensive glazing throughout to provide natural light and visibility for students and staff. What you may not realize is that a significant portion of the glass used to illuminate the school also provides protection against the spread of flames and smoke. In fact, its clear form is hardly distinguishable from its non-fire- rated glass counterparts. This is a credit to recent manufacturing advances.

Over the last decades, manufacturers have developed clear, sleek and highperforming fire-rated glazing products that resemble ordinary window glass. They can meet the dual goals of code-required life safety in schools and beautiful esthetics, eliminating a common point of frustration for architects: compromising their design vision for the sake of safety.

A new way with fire-rated glazing

For years, traditional, polished, wired fire-rated glass was the most commonly specified fire-rated glass product in schools. Although it had a proven fire safety track record, its industrial appearance and size restrictions prevented design professionals from creating open, light-filled spaces conducive to student learning. It also presented challenges in areas with fire- and impact-safety requirements.

Wired glass is only capable of resisting 100 foot-pounds of impact, which is equivalent to a five-year-old running into the glass. However, because it was the only glazing material at the time that could protect against the spread of flames and smoke for a reasonable length of time (termed “fire protective”), the Canadian General Standards Board (CGSB) granted a code exemption and deemed it suitable for use in areas requiring fire- and impact-safety protection. This exemption left the door open to student injuries from glass breakage. The frequent movement of students throughout the day means that impact safety must be a high priority, even in areas with fire safety criteria. Design professionals did not have access to a glass product that could satisfy both requirements.

To combat problems with fire-protectiverated glass’ appearance and impact-safety restrictions, manufacturers set out to improve the optical quality and performance of firerated glazing. By the late 20th century, they were producing wireless fire-protective glass with high levels of impact safety. Products are now available that can resist approximately 400 foot-pounds of impact, which is similar to withstanding the impact of a full-grown adult. Such glass can meet CPSC 16 CFR 1201 (Category II), which is a classification similar to CAN/CGSB 12.1 (Category II).

With clear, multitasking fire-protectiverated glass products at their disposal, design professionals no longer have to trade fire protection for impact safety or appearance in educational facilities. This is evidenced in Brooklin High School. To match the esthetic of non-rated glass systems and promote daylight transfer, Aerloc Industries of Dundas, Ont., installed 3,500 square feet of highperformance fire-rated glass ceramic in doors, sidelites, transoms and interior windows. This included installations in highly visible areas, such as the school’s second-floor loft overlooking a common area. The tough, yet transparent form of the fire-rated glass ceramic provides essential life safety while resembling the look of ordinary window glass. It is also impact safety-rated to help prevent injuries from glass breakage if students run into it.

Greater design flexibility

While transparent fire-protective ceramic glazing products proved a significant improvement over their wired predecessors, the development of wireless fire-rated glass with heat-blocking capabilities (“fire resistance”) took design flexibility a step further in areas with stringent fire and life safety requirements. These products provide nearly the same level of clarity as ordinary float glass, carry fire ratings up to 120 minutes, pass the fire and hose stream tests and offer up to Category II impact safety ratings. Most notably, they pass the test standards for solid walls (CAN/ULC S101), allowing design professionals to create fire-rated glass assemblies that exceed 25 per cent of the total wall area.

When paired with fire-resistive frames, buildings teams can use fire-resistive glass to create large expanses of see-through walls in areas that would otherwise require concrete, gypsum or other opaque fire-rated materials to meet codes. This is a key design benefit for schools, as project teams can incorporate fire-rated glass wall panels throughout school corridors, where illumination and views to the outside can improve the learning environment for students. Project teams can also use fire-rated glass curtain walls to maximize daylight penetration and maintain visibility through interior spaces.

For schools with strict design and performance criteria, a new set of fire-rated glazing systems are emerging that allow design professionals to make the most of learning environments while still providing protection from the threat of fire. Among the options are fire-rated glass floor systems. These assemblies can facilitate views and allow daylight to penetrate deep into buildings, provide a durable walking surface, and block flames, smoke and heat.

Design professionals can also select from two of the newest fire-resistive- rated glazing options on the market: siliconeglazed (SG) fire-rated curtain walls and buttglazed, fire-rated framing systems. SG fire-rated curtain walls provide a smooth, frame-free exterior surface. They are ideal for inner city schools with lot line protection requirements in highly visible areas. Butt glazed, fire-rated systems are another design-forward option. They enable extensive fire-rated glazed walls with virtually uninterrupted views and can enhance light transmission in corridors.

About the author

Jeff Razwick is the president of Technical Glass Products (TGP) and is a past chair of the Glass Association of North America’s (GANA) Fire- Rated Glazing Council (FRGC).

FIRE RESISTIVE VS. FIRE PROTECTIVE

When reading specifications for fire-rated glass, it is important to know the terms “fire resistive” and “fire protective” and what they mean. They are referring to two quite different standards of glazing.

Fire protective

Fire protective glass prevents the spread of flames and smoke for some period of time, typically anywhere from 20 to 180 minutes. These are the applications where wired glass was widely used in the past, though glass ceramics and specially tempered glass can also have this rating.

Fire resistive

Fire resistive is a higher rating of fire protection because it not only stops the spread of flames and smoke as fire protective glass does, but also blocks the transfer of radiant and conductive heat through the glass. Fire resistive glass products are usually multi-laminates incorporating several layers of glass with fire-resistive interlayers. Codes call for fire-resistive ratings when glass is performing the function of a wall, especially an interior wall for an access zone such as a stairwell or corridor. Fire protective glass must limit temperature rise on the “cold” side of the glass and also be able to withstand a hose stream test after heating.

©Annex Glass Canada. View All Articles.

Schools With A View
https://magazine.glasscanadamag.com/articles/schools-with-a-view

Menu
  • Page View
  • Contents View
  • Advertisers
  • Website

Issue List

August 2025

June 2025

Top Glass Showguide 2025

March 2025

October 2024

August 2024

June 2024

Top Glass Showguide 2024

March 2024

October 2023

August 2023

June 2023

Top Glass Showguide 2023

March 2023

December 2022

October 2022

August 2022

June 2022

April 2022

February 2022

December 2021

October 2021

August 2021

June 2021

April 2021

February 2021

December 2020

October 2020

August 2020

June 2020

April 2020

February 2020

December 2019

October 2019

August 2019

June 2019

April 2019

February 2019

December 2018

October 2018

August 2018

June 2018

April 2018

February 2018

December 2017

October 2017

August 2017

June 2017

April 2017

February 2017

December 2016

October 2016

August 2016

June 2016

TopGlass-ShowReport-May16

April 2016

February 2016

December 2015

WINDOOR-DigitalWrap-2015

October 2015

August 2015

June 2015

Top Glass digital wrap up

April 2015

February 2015

December 2014

October 2014

August 2014

June 2014

April 2014

February 2014

December 2013

October 2013

August 2013

Top Glass, June 2013

June 2013

April 2013

February 2013

December 2012

October 2012

August 2012

June 2012

Directory 2012

May 2012

February 2012

December 2011

October 2011

August 2011

June 2011

April 2011

February 2011

December 2010

October 2010

July/August 2010

May/June 2010

March/April 2010

January/February 2010

December 2009

October 2009

August 2009

June 2009

April 09

Feb 2009

December 2008

October 08

August 2008

June 2008

April 2008


Library